Can you really earn money doing stock photography? Is stock photography dead? What is a realistic income from stock photography? And is it really worth it?

These are some of the many questions that you may be wondering at the beginning of your stock photography journey. They are all good questions but don&#;t really have a simple answer.

Yes, you can earn money from stock photography, BUT it&#;s getting harder each year as more and more photographers are stepping in and the market has become over-saturated.

No, stock photography is not dead. You can still do money with it, but you have to focus on images that sell. Easier said than done though&#;

What kind of realistic income you can expect from stock photography? That depends on a lot of your personality and how much you are willing to work for it. The more you work = More the income.

And is it really worth it? This again depends a lot on you and how much time and effort you think is reasonable compared to the results obtained.

I know photographers who make thousands of dollars each month solely from stock photography. However, these guys are professionals and have been building their portfolios for years so you can&#;t expect to earn the same amounts right away&#;

So what can you expect to earn? What is a realistic income from stock photography?

I can tell you my own story and how much I&#;m earning from stock photography and how much effort I&#;ve can you still make money with stock photography given to it. It&#;s not a story on how to become rich quickly, but it&#;s a real and honest example of how much you can expect to earn from stock photography after a couple of years contributing.

Related readings:

What is Realistic to Earn from Stock Photography Today?

You can read my Stock Photography Earnings Report to have an idea of how much some random dude from nowhere can earn from stock photography in For short, my stock photography earnings in was approximately $ It is not much, but I&#;m happy with it. It covers my photography expenses and more.

The first 3 months of seems even better. My stock photography earnings app geld verdienen mit laufen been around $$ per month in my 3 best selling stock sites together. Those would be Shutterstock, Adobe Stock, and EyeEm.

This year I&#;ve also started to contribute to IStock, can you still make money with stock photography, but I haven&#;t got any earnings from them yet as I&#;ve just started. However, I expect IStock to earn me some extra in few months increasing my total earnings for this year.

It has taken me 2,5 years to grow my portfolios up to images. That makes only 8 images per week on average. So I&#;ve been building my portfolios pretty slowly.

So is it worth the effort? I&#;d say yes as I&#;ve been building this beside my day job and still be able to live a pretty much normal life.

8 images per week are not much work, just 1,14 images per day on average. You could upload 50 images per week if you really have a heart for it.

However, I have to make clear that I&#;ve been photographing more or less since so I already know how to make good photos. That being said, you can&#;t expect to start earning or to understand photography just by buying a camera and starting to shoot. You need to know the basics first.

You need to understand Stock Photography also. Stock Photography is not just making pretty pictures. It&#;s about making pictures that have some sort of concept to them and sits well on advertisements, brochures, and commercial websites. This is something that I understood pretty late and therefore my portfolios are full of images of nameless landscapes that never sell.

Stock Photography requires a bit of strategic thinking and a business mindset. You need to understand supply and demand. A niche with high demand, but millions of images available may sell worse than a niche with lower demand, but not many images available. A person holding a wine glass sells better than a wine glass on the table without people.

People images and lifestyle sells well the experts say. However, I have very little images of people as I&#;m not so good at photographing them, but I&#;m still able to sell my images nonetheless, can you still make money with stock photography. You may be doing much better if you can make people images with signed model releases.

These stock investing companies just a few examples. You can learn more about how to sell your photos online from my posts  Stock Photography – How to make money with photographyand Stock Photography Tips- Tips To Selling More Photos.

Stock Photography Q1 Earnings

Like said, my stock photography earnings in the three of my best selling stock photo sites have been excellent so far. However, Alamy has performed poorly compared to others. Alamy is a very different site though as it is more or less midstock site and more concentrated on editorial images. Usually, Alamy doesn&#;t sell much, but when it sells, it tends to be a pretty big sale.

Let&#;s take a closer Q1 analysis on the three of can you still make money with stock photography best-selling sites Shutterstock, Adobe Stock, and EyeEm.

You can find my total earnings summary and chart at the end of this post.

Shutterstock Earnings

Shutterstock continues to be my number one money machine. After the November-December dip, can you still make money with stock photography, the earnings have risen above $ in January-March. The main reason for these numbers are the &#;biggie&#; sales that have made a return since October

&#;Biggies&#; are sales that sell usually between $$60 per image, can you still make money with stock photography. I&#;ve been having those per month in that have helped me to achieve these figures. However, these &#;biggies&#; are very uncertain and I can&#;t rely on having them each month. Therefore some dipping on earnings is likely in the coming months.

At the moment I have about images in my Shutterstock Portfolio.

Below you can see my Shutterstock earnings compared to earnings.

Adobe Stock Earnings

My Adobe Stock earnings are approximately only half of my Shutterstock earning. However, in my Adobe Stock portfolio, I have only images and the earnings are on a rising trend as you can see on the chart below. I&#;m very optimistic that his trend will continue as long as I keep uploading good quality images each month.

Adobe Stock and Shutterstock both sell almost the same images with the difference that Shutterstock also sells editorial photos while Adobe Stock does not. That also explains why we have so many more images on Shutterstock than Adobe Stock.

EyeEm Earnings

EyeEm is a very different stock photo site than Adobe Stock and Shutterstock. EyeEm sales are very unpredictable and earnings vary a lot. The sales volume is nowhere near to Shutterstock or Adobe Stock, but single sales can be high.

For example, in February I sold only 15 photos on EyeEm, but my earnings were $ For comparison, Shutterstock sold images and made only $

Most of EyeEm sales are so-called partner sales. These sales come via EyeEm partners, mostly Getty Images. This means that the photographer only receives 50% what EyeEm receives from its partner. Nobody knows exactly what kind of deal EyeEm has with Getty Images, but it can&#;t be much better than what direct contributors of Getty Images are normally having. Single Eyeem partner sales via Getty Images sell between $$80 or so.

However, occasional direct EyeEm market sales sell between $$ These happen sometimes and are always a nice surprise.

Below you can see a chart of my EyeEm earnings in

Conclusion

So what is realistic income from stock photography? Doing $$ a month after 2,5 years and uploading 8 images in a week on average into 4 stock sites is pretty realistic in my opinion and I&#;m sure you can do better than that if you really have a heart for it.

The best thing with stock photography is that after you&#;ve done all the hard work and uploaded the images for sale, the money those images generate is totally passive income.

When I started in autumnI already read complaints about the over-saturated market. However, good images always sell, and finding a niche that is less covered is still very much possible. You just need to do some research to find them.

So go for it! I recommend joining Shutterstockfor starters if you haven&#;t already as it is the best selling site almost for everyone I&#;ve been talking to.

Finally, below you can find a summary of my FULL YEAR earnings. Thanks for reading!

Related readings:

Whether you're a pro photographer looking for a new income stream or a hobbyist photographer hunting for a side income, selling shots on stock photography websites could be a valuable tool in can you still make money with stock photography arsenal.

Although there are plenty of ways to earn a living from photography, selling stock photography is one that's often overlooked. It's unlikely to provide you with a full-time income. But it could be a great way to earn some extra cash to cover the cost of your gear without taking up too much of your time.

To learn more about what it takes to earn some cash from stock photography, we spoke can you still make money with stock photography keen photographer James Wheeler, who now routinely makes hundreds of dollars per month doing just this.

Like many of us, can you still make money with stock photography, James first played around with photography with a point-and-shoot digital camera. It was mainly a way to document his travels. Inhowever, he started taking photography more seriously; he purchased an entry-level DSLR and spent several years studying the subject.

He now shoots with a Nikon D and a Panasonic GH4, and sells his photos (and prints) on foreign source passive income number of stock photography websites, as well as on his own site, for a bit of extra income.

Here's what I learned from chatting with him.

Keep Your Expectations in Check

Although James earned his first stock photography income within just a month of uploading his first batch of photos, you shouldn't expect to make a full-time living from this. Those that do are a very rare breed.

With around quality photos listed on half a dozen stock sites, James usually makes at least a couple hundred sales per month, totaling a few thousand dollars per year.

A couple times per month, James will sell a shot on stock photography site px and receive $5-$ He also sells the rights to his photos on his own site for $99, but those sales are pretty sparse. Rather, the vast majority of his sales come from microstock sites that dish out $$ for each sale.

As you can see, this is a numbers game. But don't be fooled: selling stock photography is not passive income.

Unfortunately, you can't just keep uploading more and more photos, and see your income increase in line with your submissions. This is because, as more people upload competing photos earn money through internet business stock sites, you'll start to see your sales fall. So in order to maintain your income, you'll need to to routinely upload more high-quality photos.

This isn't meant to put you off, but rather to dispel any illusions you may have about using stock photography as a passive income stream.

Take Great Photos

When trying your hand at selling stock photos, you will face some rejection. Top stock photography can you still make money with stock photography such as Shutterstock and px maintain high standards, rejecting at least as many photos as they accept. In total, James has attempted to upload around images to sites like these, with around of them being accepted.

That's why, before you even attempt to list any of your photos, you should browse these sites. Understand the standard you need to meet before the better stock sites will accept your work. There are, of course, other sites that have lower standards, but these generally pay a lower commission.

If your skills need some work, there can you still make money with stock photography a number of fantastic (and affordable) photography courses available online. Spend time improving the areas of photography you most enjoy. As side income, it shouldn't turn into a chore. For James, his passion is landscape photography. For you, it could be food, portrait, product, or architecture photography. Perhaps something else.

Know What Sells

Next, you're going to want to learn about what actually sells on stock photography websites.

Remember, stock photos are not meant to be an artistic expression. They are photos that are (usually) used to fill a commercial need. They're often used to portray a specific point or emotion, or to focus on a specific subject. Always keep this in mind when your camera is in your hands.

According to Photoworkout, topics that are currently in fashion include: nostalgia, mindfulness, tech advances, and social issues. According to Webascender, these are shots that show authenticity, people with tech, people with analog devices, people with plants, beautiful beaches, and people who are in the moment.

Don't just rely on lists like these, though. Spend time doing your own research by browsing the top stock websites to see the subjects and styles that are popular.

On Shutterstock's advanced search page, for instance, you can order your search results by popularity. The same can be done on iStockPhoto. Studying these results will give you valuable insight into the subjects and styles that you could choose to focus on.

Make Sure You Stand Out

Once you've figured out what kind of photos are likely to sell, simply copying these styles and subjects and expecting the cash to roll in isn't enough.

James advises you to "search for what you plan to shoot. When you see the results, ask yourself, 'Can I shoot this subject in a better/different way?' If the answer is No, move on to a different subject, but if the answer is Yes, try it." And be sure to check out this guide on how to make your stock photos stand out.

He goes on to say that "people buy stock photography for almost anything, but you need to have the best photo of that subject to get the sale."

Choosing Where to Sell

Selling stock photos is like selling any other product. If people can't find what you're selling, they won't buy it.

First, you need to know where to sell your photos. For James, Shutterstock has always been his top performer, with px recently making it to second place. There are plenty of other options, though. These include Alamy, iStockPhoto, Photoshelter, Fotolia, and more.

Each of these sites offers different commissions (many offering to pay you more if you post your photos exclusively on their site). Do your due diligence to find the best places to sell your standard life investments uk equity income unconstrained fund Knowing How to Sell

In the case of how to sell your stock photos, what's important is your choice of title, description, and tags. When doing this, simply being literal do twitter make money enough. One example that Microstock Insider gives is that of a street sign with diverging arrows. This can also "represent choice or decision, but only gains that meaning when paired with a title."

With all of the photos you upload, give careful consideration to your title, description, and tags to ensure your shots are appearing in search results that relate directly and indirectly to your photo.

Patience and Perseverance

Yes, James started earning a small amount of income within a month of submitting stock photographs. But if can you still make money with stock photography want to earn enough to make a dent, can you still make money with stock photography going to need to invest some time and energy.

Once you've gone through all of the steps above, you'll have a good idea about what's going to work for you can you still make money with stock photography what isn't. But based on the rejections you receive, and the results you experience, the learning curve will continue, and bitcoin investing australia questions and answers approach will evolve.

This takes time. Trial and error. Patience. Perseverance. But when you start to get some hard evidence of how your photos are performing, use this information to scale what's working, and cut back on what isn't. After all, you're going to need shake your money maker gelish considerable stock photo portfolio to generate a meaningful revenue stream.

To save time with this, James co-founded Photoloo, a site that simplifies uploading, posting and managing photos to multiple photography, social media, and microstock sites.

Getting Started

Unsurprisingly, there's more to making money by selling stock photos than meets the eye. But now that you know the deal, you can approach this opportunity with your eyes wide open.

This is not a way to make a passive income. Nor is it an "easy" way to make money (if there is such a thing).

You'll need to spend can you still make money with stock photography figuring out what to shoot. Constantly improve your photography skills. Keep one eye on what's happening in the stock photography world (Microstock Diaries is great for this). And you'll need to consistently bitcoin investment companies in ghana more photos to your stock portfolio.

The positives, though, are that if you have a good eye for photography, invest money in stocks uk barriers to entry are low. Anyone can give this a go, and with some perserverance, have a good shot at generating a side-income that could make all the difference to your monthly budget.

And if you pop your photos up on Instagram, there are money-making opportunities there too. You should find out how to earn money from Instagram and check out the best affiliate programs to make money on Instagram?

Read Next

ShareTweetShareEmail

About The Author

Rob Nightingale ( Articles Published)

Rob Nightingale has a degree in Philosophy from the University of York, UK. He has worked as a social media manager and consultant for over five years, while giving workshops in several countries, can you still make money with stock photography. For the past can you still make money with stock photography years, Rob has also been a technology writer, and is MakeUseOf's Social Media Manager, and Newsletter Editor. You'll usually find him traveling the world, learning video editing, and experimenting with photography.

More From Rob Nightingale

A quick note before going further: being mainly a photography contributor on stock websites, in this article I mostly refer to pictures instead of the more general term &#;content&#;, but everything I talk about is equally valid for illustrations (including vector images), videos, motion graphics, character animations, audio (music and sound effects) and pretty much any other kind of creative work (templates, brushes, editable Photoshop files, 3D models and textures, etc.).

Let&#;s be clear from the start: selling stock is not a get-rich-quick method and while it is a good way to build a passive income stream, just like anything it requires some work and dedication, a lot of it in the beginning. It does get much easier with time and experience, though, and it does work.

In this article, I share some thoughts, can you still make money with stock photography, based on my own experience. Hopefully it&#;ll give you a better understanding of what to expect when you start selling stock photography.

The name of the game: numbers

A few years ago, I heard an interview of a successful photographer in which he said roughly &#;Back in the &#;80s, I could sell a single print for$. Can you still make money with stock photography, I sell stock photos for 1 $ apiece topeople.&#;  I might be somewhat off regarding the numbers he cited, but you get the idea.

Let&#;s face it, unless you are one of the very few who are famous artists, successful celebrity photographers or YouTube mini-celebrities, odds are you will never sell prints for many thousands of dollars each. That is of course true for me, as well.

In an era where most people can afford to buy a DSLR camera, many photographers struggle to make ends meet. Stock photography is easy to get into and is therefore an good option to complement your income or can you still make money with stock photography, in some cases, make really good money.

One of the most common criticisms of stock photography is, rightly, that for every single sale you will earn very little, usually between just a few cents and a few dollars per picture* (more for videos), so you need to sell many pictures, many times, for those earnings to add up. More on that below.

Additionally, it is so easy to contribute stock content that many people do it, with varying degrees of success. Depending on an image&#;s subject and quality, the market for it can be very large with fierce competition, or very small with little competition.

The most popular stock photo websites (Adobe Stock, Shutterstock and Getty Images/iStock) have catalogues of hundreds of millions of images. Even though each of those sites has millions of customers searching for a wide range of content, it&#;s obviously impossible for a few photos to stand out.

The rule #1 in stock photography is thus to work on building a large portfolio (ideally thousands of images), which is the best way to ensure a relatively steady amount of sales. You don&#;t have to start can you still make money with stock photography a huge collection, though, far from it, but it should be your end goal.

* The earning per picture varies wildly depending on the stock agency, selling price, image license and sometimes number of sales in a given period. I talk numbers in details in the related article about Adobe Stock vs Shutterstock, but to sum up, can you still make money with stock photography, since I&#;ve started selling pictures on those websites, my average earnings per sale is US$.

Few pictures will be successful and that&#;s ok

Don&#;t expect to sell every single picture in your stock photo portfolio. Even if a few images in a series (same subject but slightly different setup), other will most likely not sell. Each contributor&#;s experience is different and I can&#;t speak for other people, but in my case, over the past couple of years, about 1 in 18 images has been purchased.

Pictures that have been uploaded more than one year ago will most likely never be sold, that&#;s just the way it is. It&#;s fine with me, as I realize that not all total money makeover forum equally good or relevant to search trends, and luck also plays its part. Indeed, an image that is sold is more likely to appear again in similar searches, and thus is more likely to be sold again. Conversely, pictures than no one buys will be shown less often and thus have a lower likelihood of being purchased in the future.

Two very similar images with the same description and keywords, uploaded at the same time, initially have the same probability of being sold. However, as soon as one is purchased by a customer, the probability is heavily skewed towards that one. I have experienced a few of those cases, in which one picture is bought dozens of times, while a similar one is purchased just by a handful of customers, or not at all.

In the long run, maybe you&#;ll sell 1 in 5 images, or 1 in 50, no one knows. Just don&#;t be discouraged because you&#;ve uploaded your first 20 or 30 images without selling a single one (yet). It&#;s not abnormal at all and shouldn&#;t be seen a sign of future lack of success.

I should add that my most recent uploads have a higher sales rate than earlier submissions, simply because I&#;ve gotten better at identifying images that are more likely to sell, writing better descriptions and adding more relevant keywords. And so will you.

Profitability

Let&#;s talk a bit more about the main issue that people tend to have with stock photography: how little you make for each sale.

As mentioned earlier, can you still make money with stock photography, earnings per sale can vary a lot, can you still make money with stock photography, usually from a few cents to a few dollars (but it can reach 25+ US$ with some licenses). For the sake of argument, let&#;s assume the average is US$/sale over a long period with many sales (at bitcoin investors dies 3 weeks time of writing, that&#;s my average earning/sale over the past couple of years).

So should you submit a picture to a stock photo agency, expecting to earn 73 cents per sale? Is that a lot or completely insignificant? Most people would say it&#;s not worth it, but the truth is you can&#;t really tell unless you dig a bit deeper.

How much time did you spend to take and prepare that picture for your stock portfolio (including editing/keywording/uploading)? Did you have to rent a photo studio, buy props and/or hire a model? Most importantly, how many times will you sell that picture (and others from that series)?

If you do rent a studio and hire a model for an afternoon, then spend hours editing the pictures, and earn just 50 cents over a year, it&#;s definitely not a good business. But let&#;s say you sell images from that series hundreds or even thousands of times, then that&#;s totally different.

Now consider the following picture, which I took while walking around. I spent maybe 15 seconds correcting the exposure and contrast, then probably a minute or so adding a description and keywords, and a few seconds more to upload and submit it. Let&#;s round it up to 2 minutes of work from the moment I grabbed my camera to stock submission. Based on my cent average commission, just one sale would translate into US$/hour, which is a very decent (or even high) rate in most countries.

This is obviously simplified, but this is basically how you should really think about stock photography. In my opinion, the right approach consists in not only considering the ridiculously low amount paid per sale, but also the actual work behind it, and this critically important factor is often overlooked.

Only when you&#;re able to make that calculation, based on (at the very least) a few dozen pictures over a few months, will you be able to decide if stock photography is profitable or not. The more pictures you have and the bitcoin investor world the period you take into account, the better your profitability calculation will be. Of course, don&#;t forget to take into account the time spent on pictures that do not sell, to get an accurate representation of you whole portfolio&#;s profitability.

I would actually go a step further and argue that if you&#;re considering publishing your existing content, can you still make money with stock photography, the time (and maybe money) spent on it is already lost anyway. So while the calculation would be different for new content created specifically for stock agencies, the potential income of your existing content should be compared to only the time needed to prepare it for stock submission. Is the expected return worth spending a few more minutes to submit your content to stock agencies? You tell me.

FYI, I&#;ve sold that picture above many times and it has earned US$ so far. It&#;s not a lot of money by any stretch of the imagination, but it took so little work that for me it was quite profitable, even if it never sells again (and taking into account the extra time spent to edit and copy/paste keywords to a few other pictures that never sold from the same series). Remember, stock photography is not about any single picture, but about quantity.

And if you are scratching your head, wondering how someone could pay for that, take a look at my post on the subject: You didn’t know you could actually sell this as stock photography

Don’t be discouraged by naysayers

One of the reasons I thought a long time (I&#;m talking years) about contributing stock content before actually doing it was that I had read many articles and comments in forums talking about how difficult it is to make more than a few dollars a month selling stock photography.

easy ways to make money business alt="">

If I have any regret, it is only to have waited so long before I started contributing stock photos.

I will not pretend that anyone can expect water technology stocks investing earn a good living after uploading just a few dozens of pictures, can you still make money with stock photography, but it has now become obvious to me that the people who complain tend to be unsuccessful for good reason (i.e. they offer content of poor quality). It seems that instead of trying to improve their work, they are convinced that they already produce top-notch content and spend their time complaining about the whole system.

However flawed it is, stock photography does allow you to earn decent money, provided your work is of good quality and meets a need from prospective buyers. Just like in any other area, you can&#;t expect to make money if you don&#;t do a good job or, as a matter of fact, if your work is fantastic but there is absolutely zero market for it.

Start now

To sum up, to earn good money, you ideally need a portfolio with thousands of varied pictures, but don&#;t wait until you have that many images to start submitting content. Even if you currently have only a couple of dozen pictures, that&#;s not a problem at all! Start now with the content you already have and then keep adding more as you create it.

As soon as you publish your first pictures, you might sell them. Hopefully, this income, as small as it may be, will show you that at least there is some potential. That&#;s certainly how I viewed it when I first started selling stock photography.

Don&#;t forget: the more pictures you publish, can you still make money with stock photography, the more money you can earn.

In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that it is clearly possible to make money, maybe a lot of it, and it depends only on the quality and quantity of your work. But like everything, stock photography has pros and cons. Maybe it&#;s not for you, just like weddings are not for me, thank you very much, but if you&#;ve been entertaining the idea of submitting your images/videos, then don&#;t wait any longer and give it a try. That&#;s the only way to know money making jobs in australia sure!

There are many can you still make money with stock photography photography websites, but I recommend you begin with at least one of these (the first three of them largely corner the market):

bitcoin investor ervaringen 99 alt="" width="" height="38">

It may take some time, but if you submit varied and good quality content, you WILL eventually get sales.

Good luck!

Are you weighing the pros and cons of starting a side gig to augment your income from full-time employment or business activity?

Do you enjoy taking photos and fancy yourself a natural?

If you’ve answered “yes” to all these questions, a side gig as a stock photographer could be in the cards. Although stock photography doesn’t make our list of the top side gigs, it’s a viable pursuit for bitcoin investition online photographers with some can you still make money with stock photography of innate talent and willingness to learn what it takes to make money with stock photography.

To be clear, stock photography is not for everyone. It’s a time-consuming side gig that’s difficult to break into and provides no income guarantees. Many would-be stock photographers lose patience with the gig before amassing a stock library large enough to generate significant monthly income.

Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations have an average return of %. For $79 (or just $ per week), join more than 1 million members and don't miss their upcoming stock picks. 30 day money-back guarantee. Sign Up Now

Stock photography won’t make you rich either. Many stock photographers do earn thousands of dollars per year from stock photography, with a lucky few clearing tens of thousands. But relatively few earn enough to quit their day jobs — although, for many, can you still make money with stock photography, those “day jobs” are other photography gigs.

Torn between the appeal of earning money for the photos you take and the often less-than-glamorous reality of stock photography? Read on for a more detailed overview of the major upsides and downsides of pursuing stock photography as a side gig.

Benefits of Stock Photography As a Side Gig

Best way to invest 1000 dollars successful stock photographers — which includes those with a nonmonetary conception of “success” — stock photography has a number of potential benefits. The big ones include the potential to earn serious income and advance one’s photography career over time, but let’s not lose sight of the fact that photography is fun — and, with careful planning, could have tax benefits.

1. You Could Earn Significant Residual Income Over Time

Stock photography cannot credibly be described as a source of passive income —that is, income that requires little to no labor to produce. Indeed, stock photography is quite labor-intensive.

However, for talented and prolific photographers at least, stock photography is absolutely a legitimate source of residual income: income that continues to roll in for months or even years after the initial income-producing activity. Stock photographers earn money every time one of their photos sells, and because demand never wanes for photos of durable, popular subjects — think abstractions like a coffee mug next to a notebook and pen — a sizable inventory of such photos can produce hundreds of dollars in income every month.

2. It’s a Fun, Potentially Lifelong Hobby

Set aside the direct financial benefits of stock photography for a moment. Even if you don’t make enough from your stock photography hobby to cover your equipment and travel costs, the activity itself has inherent value. You probably wouldn’t consider a labor-intensive side gig like stock photography if you didn’t enjoy taking photos in the first place. And because photography isn’t especially demanding in a physical sense — exotic, on-location nature shoots and adventure-sports photography notwithstanding — it can be a true lifelong pursuit.

3. It Could Lead to Higher-Paying or More Prestigious Gigs

“Microstock” websites like Shutterstock and iStock are fairly accessible for newer photographers looking to break into stock photography. If you know basically how to operate a digital camera and compose a quality shot, and if you can follow these websites’ reasonable submission guidelines, you should have no trouble getting your photos approved.

The higher echelons of the photography industry are much more competitive. That includes “macrostock” websites like Getty Images and Alamy, whose contributors tend to be professionals or serious hobbyists with expensive equipment and talent to match; as well as contract gigs like magazine shoots, photojournalism, and wedding and event photography. Photographers rarely break into these niches without prior experience.

Often, that prior experience is relatively low-paying stock photography work for microstock sites. Build up an attractive body of work that sells, promote yourself through a personal website, built with Wix, and photographer-friendly freelance websites like Upwork, and relentlessly apply for gigs — that’s how you move up in this business.

4. It Could Turn Into a Full-Time Business

Many stock photographers prefer to keep things casual — shooting and submitting occasionally without quitting their day jobs. This approach caps income potential and limits visibility in the marketplace, but that’s fine by photographers uninterested in taking the next step.

However, if you do aspire to work full-time as a photographer, stock photography is a good entry point, not least because it validates your talent — assuming your photos sell.

5. Can you still make money with stock photography Could Reduce Your Income Tax Bill

A side gig can impact your taxes in multiple ways, can you still make money with stock photography, not all of them positive. In temporarily eliminating a key tax deduction for folks with financially draining spare-time pursuits, the Bitcoin mining plywood hot section cool section Cuts and Jobs Act of compels hobbyists to treat their hobbies as businesses. This means accounting for revenues and expenses, including costs related to qualifying business use of the home and depreciation for equipment, to preserve potential business tax deductions.

The silver lining here is that, if you treat stock photography as a legitimate side business, you could reap substantial tax benefits. Common business deductions for stock photographers include:

• Housing payments, utilities, and other overhead costs related to a qualifying home office or studio used exclusively for business purposes
• Equipment costs, either depreciated over time (more likely for expensive equipment like cameras and computers) or deducted in the tax year incurred (more likely for less expensive accessories and software)
• Travel expenses incurred for trips or excursions devoted to photography, including airfare, vehicle mileage or car rental expenses, lodging, and certain incidental expenses

Talk to a tax professional about how to claim these and other potential business deductions without running afoul of current tax law.

---

Downsides of Stock Photography As a Side Gig

Making a living or even earning significant income as a stock photographer takes real work — like “hundreds and hundreds of hours over several years” work. Unless you have a nice camera and accessories already, it’s also fairly expensive to get started, and you won’t see real income for months unless you’re extremely lucky. Get ready for intense competition, even at the industry’s lower rungs, and difficulty breaking into higher-paying gigs.

1. Getting Started Is Expensive

Unless you have a high-quality camera already, launching a stock photography side gig is not cheap, notwithstanding potential tax deductibility. Expect to pay several hundred dollars for a decent digital camera and significantly more than that for recommended-but-not-required equipment and accessories like external lighting and a tripod. You’re not guaranteed to make back this initial investment, and even if you eventually do, the hit to your budget or cash reserves could be painful in the meantime.

2. The Stock Photography Business Is Extremely Competitive

Although it’s not difficult for photographers with decent skills and equipment to get microstock websites to approve at least some of their photo submissions, mere approval does not guarantee income. Microstock (and some macrostock) websites often have millions of photos in their archives — a big selling point for buyers but clearly a disadvantage for new photographers struggling to get noticed.

3. You’re Unlikely to Earn Much Early On

New stock photographers don’t earn much early on due to the stock photography business’s intense competitive landscape, often can you still make money with stock photography microstock commissions — anywhere from 15% to more than 50% of the sale price — and the time required to build a library of hundreds or thousands of stock photos available for sale. Unless you’re lucky, your gross income from stock photography is unlikely to pick up until your personal library numbers in the hundreds of images.

4. Earning Significant Income From Microstock Requires a Major Time Commitment

It bears repeating that earning significant income as a stock photographer requires a major time commitment in the early going — a period measured in years for most aspiring photographers. If your aim is to build a library featuring at least 1, unique photos within two to four years — what you’ll likely need to earn at least $ per month in residual income from microstock sales alone — you should expect to devote several hours per week shooting, editing, can you still make money with stock photography, and submitting photos.

5. Most Successful Stock Photographers Work With Human Subjects and/or Travel Regularly

Your earnings as a stock photographer depend to a great degree on how much you’re willing and able to devote to the enterprise. Stock photographers who travel to exotic locations, wait days or weeks for unusual weather events, or feature human subjects in their work tend to do better than those content not to go too far out of their way. Regular travel requires financial resources beyond the capacity of many aspiring photographers; patience demands a time commitment that ways to make money fast from home can’t meet; and human subjects need to be paid or convinced to waive their legal rights to their likenesses.

---

Final Word

Stock photography is not the ideal side gig for everyone. It has a number best website buy bitcoin uk drawbacks that shouldn’t be minimized: relatively high startup costs, intense competition, slow initial earnings, and onerous demands on serious stock photographers’ time. Given these and other barriers to entry, no one would blame you for passing on stock photography.

Yet stock photography’s very competitiveness makes abundantly clear that stock photography is a viable, even lucrative side gig for countless hobbyists. For a lucky few, it holds the promise of consistent, full-time income without the hour (or longer) workweek.

One thing is beyond dispute: No matter how talented or lucky you are, creating a self-sustaining stock photography business takes time — years — and hundreds of hours of work. Whether that’s fine by you will probably determine whether you’re willing to give it a go.

Are you considering a gig as a stock photographer? Does it seem worth your time?